Management System Certification Bodies
ISO/IEC 17021-1
Management system certification bodies provide independent certification of organizations against defined management system requirements. GTAF evaluates the competence, impartiality and consistent operation of certification bodies so that certification decisions are supported by reliable assessment processes.
Competence, impartiality and confidence
GTAF’s accreditation approach is designed to provide a structured, evidence-based evaluation of organizations performing conformity assessment activities. The emphasis is on technical competence, impartiality, consistent processes and confidence in results or certification decisions.
Certification decision integrity
Clear separation of assessment, review and certification decision functions, supported by documented controls.
Competent assessment resources
Qualified auditors, reviewers and technical resources appropriate to the certification scopes offered.
Impartiality management
Identification, evaluation and treatment of risks that could compromise objective certification activities.
Consistent certification process
Defined arrangements for application review, audit planning, audit reporting, certification, surveillance and recertification.
Define the scope with precision
The accreditation scope should clearly describe the activities, sectors, methods, schemes or technical fields for which competence is demonstrated.
- Quality management systems
- Environmental management systems
- Occupational health and safety management systems
- Information security and other sector-specific management systems
Evidence that supports reliable outcomes
Assessment considers the organization’s documented arrangements and their effective implementation. Depending on the programme and scope, evidence may include:
- Competent personnel and defined responsibilities
- Controlled procedures, records and technical methods
- Suitable facilities, equipment and resources
- Impartiality and confidentiality controls
- Quality assurance, monitoring and continual improvement
- Effective handling of complaints, appeals or feedback where applicable
A clear path from application to surveillance
The detailed sequence is tailored to the programme and requested scope, while maintaining a consistent accreditation decision framework.
Application
Application and scope review
Competence
Competence and resource evaluation
Assessment of certification activities
Assessment of certification activities
Review of findings
Review of findings and corrective actions
Accreditation decision
Accreditation decision and ongoing surveillance
Frequently asked questions
Explore accreditation for your organization.
Review the applicable requirements and submit your accreditation enquiry or application to begin the process.